Lesson 7 – Indoor Air Quality Procedure (IAQP): Conceptual Overview
The Indoor Air Quality Procedure (IAQP) is often presented as an advanced or alternative method to the Ventilation Rate Procedure.
In practice, it is not a shortcut, nor is it a way to reduce ventilation without responsibility.
This lesson explains what IAQP is, why it exists, and how its philosophy differs fundamentally from VRP, without introducing equations or complex modeling.
Why IAQP Exists
The Ventilation Rate Procedure assumes that acceptable indoor air quality can be achieved by supplying a predefined amount of outdoor air.
This approach works well when contaminant sources are typical and ventilation is the primary control strategy.
However, not all indoor environments behave the same way.
Some spaces have identifiable contaminant sources, known emission characteristics, or effective non-ventilation control measures.
In such cases, prescribing outdoor air rates alone may not reflect actual indoor air quality conditions.
IAQP exists to address these situations.
What Is the Indoor Air Quality Procedure?
The Indoor Air Quality Procedure is a performance-based approach to ventilation design.
Instead of prescribing outdoor air flow rates, IAQP focuses on maintaining contaminant concentrations below acceptable limits.
In simple terms, IAQP asks a different question than VRP.
VRP asks: How much outdoor air should be supplied?
IAQP asks: What indoor air quality level must be achieved, and how can it be maintained?
A Shift in Design Philosophy
Under IAQP, ventilation is no longer the only control mechanism.
Acceptable indoor air quality may be achieved through a combination of:
- Ventilation
- Source control
- Air cleaning
- Filtration
- Space pressurization strategies
This flexibility is both the strength and the challenge of IAQP.
Why IAQP Is Less Commonly Used
Despite its conceptual advantages, IAQP is less frequently applied in practice.
This is not because it is inferior, but because it requires more responsibility and justification from the designer.
IAQP demands:
- Identification of relevant contaminants
- Definition of acceptable concentration limits
- Understanding of emission rates and removal mechanisms
- Evidence that the selected strategy maintains IAQ over time
For many projects, this level of analysis is avoided in favor of prescriptive compliance.
IAQP Is Not “Less Ventilation by Default”
A common misconception is that IAQP exists primarily to reduce outdoor air requirements.
In reality, IAQP does not guarantee lower ventilation rates.
In some cases, IAQP may result in similar or even higher outdoor air flow if contaminant sources are significant or poorly controlled.
The key difference is that IAQP ties ventilation requirements to actual air quality outcomes rather than fixed assumptions.
Where IAQP Fits in Real Projects
IAQP is most appropriate in environments where:
- Contaminant sources are well understood
- Non-ventilation control measures are effective
- Energy performance is critical
- Ventilation rates derived from VRP appear excessively conservative
However, IAQP is not a casual alternative.
It is a deliberate design choice that must be supported by technical justification.
IAQP and Accountability
One reason IAQP is approached cautiously is that it shifts accountability.
Under VRP, compliance is achieved by following prescribed tables and equations.
Under IAQP, the designer is responsible for demonstrating that acceptable indoor air quality is achieved.
This responsibility extends beyond design calculations and includes assumptions, control strategies, and long-term operation.
Why Understanding IAQP Matters Even If You Do Not Use It
Even when IAQP is not applied directly, understanding its philosophy improves the way VRP is used.
It encourages engineers to think in terms of contaminant control rather than airflow alone.
This mindset helps identify when VRP assumptions are overly conservative and when alternative strategies may be appropriate.
Key Takeaway
The Indoor Air Quality Procedure is a performance-based approach that focuses on controlling contaminant concentrations rather than prescribing outdoor air flow rates.
It offers flexibility and potential optimization, but requires deeper understanding, justification, and accountability from the designer.
IAQP is not an escape from ventilation requirements, but a different way of defining and achieving indoor air quality.
Reflection Question
In your projects, do ventilation decisions focus more on meeting prescribed airflow values, or on achieving measurable indoor air quality outcomes?
Pause here and reflect before continuing.
Consider how accountability shifts when performance replaces prescription.
Next Lesson →